Analysis of “The Trouble with Fries” Essay

Malcolm Gladwells article The overturn with Fries is most a rattling invasive topic. solid Food is killing us. Can it be fixed? Although his thesis steatment isnt exactly clear, he effectively uses reason to convince his audience that a fodder movement is needed especially for solid sustenance. By discussing many factors with supporting march that is f true(a) he shows why dissolute sustenance is struggling to have a nutrition movement. Malcolm Gladwell uses some very ignominious facts ab aside cut fries and how proinflammatory they argon for the trunk. He states the average American eats about thirty pounds of cut fries a year.In 1990, health concerns arose about using animal-based cooking crude to incomprehensible fry them. This caused major fast-food houses to substitute to deep frying in veg oil. Gladwell then proves this change to be take down unfitter. Switching to vegetable oil substance going from saturated lucubrate to trans-fat, this makes the body s ability to regulate cholesterin uncontrollable. Vegetable oil becomes a trans-fat because it has to go through hydrogenation to become suitable for deep frying. According to a study Gladwell uses, for for each one 5% increase in the number of saturated fats that a woman consumes, her adventure of heart disease increases by 17%.But just a 2% increase in trans-fat will increase her heart disease risk by 93%. This study was designed by Walter Willett who alike states that the consumption of trans-fat in the linked States probably causes about 30,000 premature deaths each year. This rise used by Gladwell is very persuasive in the matter that an actual nutrition movement is needed. Gladwell discusses an alternative healthy way to deep fry cut fries which shows peachy strength in his argument. The much healthier way of deep-frying French fries is by using Olestra, Malcolm Gladwell discusses.Olestra is a fat substitute that cannot be thoughtless by the body. Frito-Lays no-f at Wow chips are made with a version of Olestra. The FDA wont approved the alternate healthier way of deep-frying French fries by using Olestra because they claim it causes GI distress. keep an eye on and Gamble, the developers of Olestra, performed a test and found that commonwealth eating typical amounts of Olestra-based chips dont have significantly more gastrointestinal problems than volume eating normal chips. The FDA is straight reviewing this finding. Gladwell used this to header out that its entirelypossible, right now, to make a French fry without many serious health concerns. The very strong point of this article is that Malcolm Gladwell not only uses French fries in his argument, scarcely cry as well, to prove that it is not only the FDA holding back a nutrition movement. Gladwell uses evidence found by chromatic University. The Auburn Team created what they called the AU leaning beef. This was a beef patty that was ? water, 20% protein, 5% fat and, ? seaweed. They did a dim taste test comparison of AU fish burgers and traditional McDonalds burgers. The AU Lean burgers won overall.AU Lean also won in a test of 100 families trying AU Lean, market beef, and 5% fat beef. What this showed was that citizenry can be fooled into speak uping theyre eating a lot of fat when they actually arent. Shortly after, McDonalds came out with the McLean Deluxe, using AU Lean beef. It was change as the healthy choice, therefore people were informed it was healthy and it went off the market. This was great evidence Gladwell used that proved Americans think healthier food wont taste as well. There was also evidence that children also think the equivalent way as the McDonalds exemplar of healthier food wont taste as good.Gladwell discusses an experiment by Leann Birch on childrens aspects of food based on restriction. The experiment consisted of a large group of children feeding them a big lunch then let them loose in a style with lots of junk food. He r findings were some children ate none of the junk food objet dart others really chowed down. This showed that the ones who chowed down are confine from high-fat, high-sugar food so they think in terms of presence and absence of food rather than their hunger. Because they had been told junk food was deadly for them, they thought that it had to taste good.This example really set the light for Gladwells argument. Its not the fact that the food is sunburnt but because of it. Malcolm Gladwell effectively convinced his audience that a nutrition movement is needed. He proves that not only the FDA is holding back an actual nutrition movement but the consumers as well. He supports this by the studies of evidence he provided stating there are healthier ways to fast food. Works Cited Gladwell, Malcolm. The Trouble with Fries. The New Yorker 5 Mar. 2001. Web. 20 Feb. 2013.